Archive for April, 2008

*Insert gratuitous Planet of the Apes reference*

Tuesday, April 29th, 2008

Well this is cool. An orangutan has been caught on film spear fishing. This sort of tool use is, apparently, entirely unpresendented in orangutans.

Spear fishing ape

Image: An orangutan attempts to spear a passing fish. (Credit: The Daily Mail)

That’s pretty awesome. Human beings are far from the only tool-using species on the planet, but this, for some reason, strikes me as a very particular sort of tool use. This is the kind of tool use that is intended to solve a very general and pressing problem: “I’m hungry and want to catch something to eat. How do I do that?” And the solution seems, to me, to be a delightfully “human” one: a handy perch and nice, sharp stick.

“We have to touch people.”

Monday, April 28th, 2008

This video struck me teary and absolutely speechless.

Video: Jacob Bronowski talks about the human side of science.

It always boggles my mind whenever anyone says that science will “dehumanize” in the same way it does when they say it will “take the mystery” out of life.  We get to be all the more human because of science.  Just as science adds wonder and mystery to our world, so too does it allow us to further pursue other quitessentially human pursuits.

The human mind is a funny, questing thing.  It is never satisfied with what it knows but, when healthy, it constantly seeks to learn more about the context in which it finds itself.  I have always felt that curiosity is one of the most fundamentally human emotions and, as such, science is one of the most fundamentally human acts.  To say that scientific pursuits might make us less human, to me, sounds equally as strange as saying that excessive dam building will de-beaver a beaver.

Admittedly, the results of science and of dam-building are very different.  (Though it took a great deal of the former for humans to be able to engage in the latter.)  Dam building did not produce the gas that Dr. Bronowski mentioned in the video.  Then again, nor did it create penicillin.  And yet both have aided in pursuits that human beings have been engaged in since pre-history.

Both allowed human beings to do exactly what they were already doing, only better.  For eons human beings had fought each other and had, in many cases, engaged in complete genocide.  The harnessing of poison gases made this genocide easier and more efficient.  For similar stretches of time, people have cared for the sick.  The creation of anti-bacterial drugs and the wide-spread use thereof made such medical care easier and more effective.

Science and technology allow is to be more human.  They help us to do those things to which we are inclined much more easily, efficiently, and effectively and they open up new avenues of thought and action for us to pursue.  And we traipse down those proverbial avenues with glee and abandon, because it is human for us to do so.  Such explorations are one of the most human of all pursuits.

To say that science dehumanizes us is, to my mind, not only wrong.  It is entirely antithetical to truth of human nature.

(Hat tip to PZ Myers over at Pharyngula for posting that video.)

Two words: “Cat Yodelling”

Saturday, April 26th, 2008

An Engineer’s Guide to Cats:

(Hat-tip to Science After Sunclipse)

Word to the Wise

Friday, April 25th, 2008

Even though it isn’t stated explicitly in the Four Rules, using firearms under the effects of mind altering substances is a Bad Idea:

“But what do we really know of the dead?”

Thursday, April 24th, 2008

Go get the new Nick Cave album.  It’s brilliant.  I reviewed it for my other blog, and I immediately thought of tons of other things I want to say about how awesome it is.  It’s smart, it’s clever, it’s fun to listen to.  Seriously, you need to own a copy.

Coming Down the Far Slope of the Uncanny Valley

Wednesday, April 23rd, 2008

I had a supremely odd experience a few days ago.  I was standing in line at the Itron cafeteria (I’m on half-time, long-term contract out there) and I was distractedly staring at no point in particular on the tile floor, shuffling my way through the line when I looked up and found myself face-to-face with a mannequin standing in the middle of the floor.

The mannequin was female and blonde.  It stood perhaps 5′ 8″ tall and, tellingly, had the kind of waxy complexion and surreally bright, marbly eyes that one only sees in childrens dolls.

It caught my eye for a brief second and then turned and wandered off.  “Holy shit!” my brain exclaimed “That’s one freaky looking robot.  It looks ALMOST human, but not quite!”  I had entered into Uncanny Valley territory.  (Yes, I was geek enough that my first thought upon seeing motion was “whoa, freaky gyndroid!”)

But here’s the thing: it was neither a mannequin, nor a robot.  It was a person.  She had on extremely thick makeup and (I think) some kind of odd contact that made her eyes unusually bright and gleamy.  Combine all that with the fact that she apparently had some kind of aversion to blinking and the net effect was that her skin look like textured, treated foam rubber and her eyes looked exactly like the creepy, dead eyes of a doll.

It turns out that, in the modern age, the Uncanny Valley is two-sided.  As a machine approaches human similarity, there’s a pitfall of emotional unease that it invariably falls into.  But as a person stops looking less and less like what we expect, they seem to tumble backwards into the same valley.  They become unnervingly human-like, even though they are, actually, human.

In retrospect, I had to laugh.  It occurs to me, though, that in studying the Uncanny Valley (a topic with which I’m obsessively fascinated) we often forget that we’re not, actually, studying something about our creations, but ourselves.  Too often we (or at least I) forget that robots may be the traditional inhabitants of the valley, but geographically, it’s located in our own minds.  It’s that part of our brain that sets off alarm bells at the not-quite-right.

I was thinking about this today and I got to wondering: could the psychological mechanisms responsible for the Uncanny Valley be responsible for prejudice?  We see someone whose skin is darker than ours and whose face is shaped almost, but not quite like the faces we typically see around us.  Perhaps there’s some niche in the Uncanny Valley that, for some, contains not machines, but “humans who aren’t like me”?

I’m not entirely convinced the mental processes are the same, but it’d be interesting to poll the emotional responses of people looking at vaguely human-like robots and compare those to (for instance) racist individuals looking at members of racial groups against which they are prejudiced.  Scientifically rigorous study of racism?  Hardly.  Damned interesting?  I think so.

At any rate, I was just interested to be reminded that there are two slopes to the Uncanny Valley.  And we pay so much attention to traversing it one way that we often forget that, under the right conditions, a reverse journey is possible, as well.

Uncanny Valley

Figure: The Uncanny Valley as graphically depicted by Masahiro Mori in his essay “The Uncanny Valley”

Anyone need a home for the summer?

Tuesday, April 22nd, 2008

I’m looking for a subletter for my current room. It’s a fantastic little room in Piraeus House (1107 E Mission Ave, an 8-person house near the GU campus) with its own sink and balcony. Rent is $390/month and that includes all utilities and furnishings (desk, bed, dressers, book shelf.)

For more info see my Craigslist ad.

XKCD is my Master now . . .

Monday, April 21st, 2008

Is it a bad thing that when I read the latest XKCD my first thought was “well, I know what I’m doing with MY summer . . .”?  I mean, my new apartment doesn’t let us have pets, but I’m sure by that they mean biological pets.  Why not a robotic one?

Vista/Crysis first impressions

Monday, April 21st, 2008

Installed vista. It’s . . . uh, glitzy. And mostly annoying. The only things I’ve found so far that I like about it are hold-overs from XP. New sound scheme? Annoying. New look? Inoffensive at best. New, muchly-vaunted “features”? So annoying that I immediately turned most of them off. (Who needs a second, analog, freakishly big clock talking up precious screen real estate?)  Opening every link in IE7, despite my default browser being set to Firefox?  Extremely irritating.  Hardware support? Sketchy. It didn’t really like my video card (nVidia 8800GTS). That was annoying, but not a show-stopper, since Vista and the 8800 managed to get along well enough to run Crysis.

And speaking of Crysis. HOLY SHIT! It’s amazing. My mom got it for me for my birthday and I am blown away. I pulled a classic “well, I’ve got an hour before I really need to be in bed; I’ll install it and just see how it is” maneuver. It’s awesome. I was really should have been asleep over three hours ago and I’m just barely able to rip myself away from it.

Story so far is well-put together, if a touch cliche. Voice acting is pretty good. The gameplay is excellent. (It’s a slow-slow-fast-slow kind of shooter: stretches of creeping and planning interspersed with brief, frenetic fire fights. At least for me, since I tend to be not-so-good at the creeping part and always manage to get myself spotted.)

And the graphics. Oh. Dear. LORD. The graphics are fantastic, especially in the rendered movies. But even regular in-game stuff is impressive. The opening scene (in which you’re being dropped onto an island) is absolutely stunning.

In summation: Vista is at best unimpressive. It seems like it a poorly-skinned, slightly broken version of XP. If you can stay with XP, do. (My machine’s set up to dual-boot and I imagine I’ll be using XP for essentially everything.) Crysis, on the other hand, is amazing. I highly recommend it.

SP2 = Epic Fail

Sunday, April 20th, 2008

Right. So I’m staying at SP1 I guess. Six attempts total now and the count stands at -

Install took, but broke things: 1

Install simply failed to work: 2

Install failed and broke my current OS install: 3

No SP2 for me. As I’ve said, XP SP1 was the best OS Microsoft ever made. Now I guess I have one more reason to stick with it.

So what am I going to do when I have run software that needs SP2 or Vista? Well, I happen to have a (free! legal!) copy of Vista Ultimate lying around that MS gave me at a launch event, so I guess I’ll just bash together a partition and throw that on there.